NIST AI RMF ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP LLM Top 10 EU AI Act NIS2 ISO/IEC 27001 MITRE ATLAS

The Enterprise AI Adoption & Governance Framework

A structured, standards-aligned operating model for adopting AI safely at scale — unifying AI governance, data governance, and AI security across the full system lifecycle.

0
Adoption Phases
0
NIST RMF Functions
0
OWASP LLM Risks
0
EU AI Act Risk Tiers
Standards Landscape

The frameworks this model is built on

Click any card to see how it shapes the adoption framework. These are the primary references enterprises are expected to align to in 2026.

Foundational Model

NIST AI Risk Management Framework

Govern is the cross-cutting function that feeds Map, Measure, and Manage — applied iteratively across the AI system lifecycle, not as one-time steps.

Selected Function
Govern
01 · Govern

Cultivate a risk-aware culture

Leadership establishes AI policy, accountability structures, and risk tolerance before systems are built. Govern is cross-cutting — it informs every other function throughout the lifecycle.

Govern
Map
Measure
Manage
The Operating Model

A 5-Phase Enterprise AI Adoption Framework

Each phase maps directly to NIST AI RMF functions and layers in the controls required by ISO/IEC 42001, OWASP, MITRE ATLAS, and applicable regulation.

AI Security

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025)

The baseline application-security taxonomy for generative and agentic AI systems. Applied during Phase 3 (Secure by Design) and Phase 4 (Assurance) of the framework.

Regulatory Alignment

EU AI Act risk tiers

Every AI use case identified in Phase 2 (Map) should be classified against these four tiers to determine its compliance obligations.

Feb 2025
Prohibited AI practices ban takes effect (unacceptable-risk systems)
Aug 2025
Obligations for general-purpose AI (GPAI) model providers apply
Aug 2 2026
Main Act applies broadly; most high-risk obligations become enforceable
Dec 2 2027*
Proposed deferral (Digital Omnibus, pending adoption) for Annex III high-risk systems
Cyber Resilience

NIS2 & AI systems

AI agents that process data or drive decisions qualify as "information systems" under NIS2 Article 21 — in-scope entities must fold them into risk management and incident-reporting obligations.

T + 24 hours
Early warning

Initial notification to the national CSIRT/authority of a significant incident involving an in-scope AI or information system.

T + 72 hours
Incident notification

Detailed assessment including severity, indicators of compromise, and initial impact on the AI system or its data.

T + 1 month
Final report

Root cause, mitigations applied, and cross-border impact where relevant. Management bodies remain personally accountable (Art. 20).

Self-Assessment

AI Governance Maturity Model

Rate your organization from 1 (Ad Hoc) to 5 (Optimizing) across five pillars to see an overall maturity score, inspired by SANS' AI Security Maturity Model and NIST's Govern function.

1.0
Average maturity level (of 5)
Level 1 · Ad Hoc
Operating Model

Governance roles & accountability

ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST's Govern function both require named, accountable ownership — not diffuse responsibility.

Readiness Check

AI adoption readiness checklist

Check off what's already in place. This gives a directional readiness score across governance, data, security, and compliance — not a certification.

0%
Readiness score
Implementation

90-day to 12-month rollout

A phased sequencing so governance, data, and security controls land before AI systems scale in production.